Why arguing does not help
Direct criticism of the group's beliefs confirms what the person is being told inside it: outsiders do not understand and are hostile. Every argument strengthens the boundary and makes returning psychologically harder.
Forced methods deserve separate mention. The practices of forcibly detaining and trying to change people's beliefs, used several decades ago, were found to be illegal and ineffective: they increased distrust and often produced the opposite result.
Keep the connection. Make regular calls without conditions or reproaches. Even an occasional conversation matters more than any argument.
Do not argue about beliefs. Ask how they are feeling, about their life and the people around them, not about faith. Talking about faith closes the conversation.
Ask questions, not give judgments. "How do you understand this?" and "What will happen if you want to leave?" The person has to find the answers themselves.
Keep the door open. Say out loud that they are welcome back at any time and without explanations. It needs to be said, not merely implied.
The third step comes from an approach in which the helper does not persuade, but helps the person notice contradictions for themselves. Asking about the cost of leaving works better than any argument: there is no prepared answer to it.
The fourth step removes the main barrier. Many people stay because they are sure they will not be accepted back after breaking off relationships and saying harsh things. A direct invitation disproves this.
What helps when someone returns
- Do not demand explanations or apologies right away: they may take months.
- Help with practical matters: documents, housing, and work - usually all of these have been lost.
- Do not forbid them from remembering the good things: there were friends and a sense of meaning there too.
- Find a specialist who has worked with cases like these, not just any psychologist.
- Be ready for returns: leaving rarely happens on the first try.
The third point is not obvious. Demanding that someone acknowledge everything they experienced as deception pushes them away: they are defending not the group, but years of their own life. Acknowledging that there were good things there speeds up the conversation rather than getting in its way.
It is worth accepting the fifth point in advance. Returning is a normal part of the process, and the response to it determines whether the next departure will happen. Reproaches after a return almost certainly close the door.
Finish reading in the Miqo app
1 more minute, then a quiz at the end. Find it under “Crime → Cults”
Point your phone camera here to open the App Store or Google Play.
Sources
- Forced methods of returning people from closed groups have been found to be ineffective and illegal
- modern approaches are built on maintaining contact, avoiding arguments about doctrine, and supporting people as they leave, while returns are considered a normal part of the process