Why workers could bargain for the first time after the plague
The plague arrived on trading ships: in fall 1347, Genoese vessels brought it to Messina, and from there it spread along ports and roads - Italy, France, England, the German lands, Scandinavia. A village could lose half its residents in a month. By 1351, the disease had swept through almost all of Europe.
Then something less obvious began. The fields, mills, granaries, and livestock were still there - the people who worked them were gone. For the first time in centuries, there were fewer workers than jobs. A peasant who had once clung to her plot could now leave for wherever she was offered more - and she would be hired.
Europe's population around 1400 - roughly this share of its pre-epidemic level
Authorities tried to reverse this with laws. In England, a 1349 ordinance and the 1351 Statute of Labourers barred employers from paying more than before the plague; similar orders appeared in France and Castile. They held up poorly: employers still had to pay more, just quietly. Europe did not regain its previous population until the 16th century: for 2 centuries, labor remained expensive, and in the West corvée labor gradually gave way to wage labor and rent.
Forty days in port: where quarantine came from
Cities realized that disease arrived with people and cargo long before they knew its cause. In 1377, Ragusa - present-day Dubrovnik - decreed that arrivals from plague-stricken places must wait 30 days in a designated location before entering the city. Later, the period in ports grew to 40. The Italian quaranta, meaning "forty," gave us the word "quarantine."
Temporary health commissions appeared at the same time; in Italian cities, they became permanent services: counting the dead, locking up homes, and checking arrivals. The pathogen would not be identified until the late 19th century - but the procedure, developed blindly, worked without it. Of the 3 responses to the plague, only this one worked. Wage laws failed almost everywhere. The third response was to seek someone to blame: in 1348-1349, Jews were accused of poisoning wells and their communities were attacked, and papal bans did not stop it.
This does not mean the plague itself created a new Europe. East of the Elbe, the opposite happened: by the 16th century, peasants' dependence had only grown stronger. The same disease, different outcome - what mattered was who could set the terms in each region. Historians still debate the plague's connection to the Renaissance.
- Look not for the death toll, but for what became scarce after the disaster.
- See who could set the terms in the region - that shaped the outcome.
- Separate the text of a law from how it was enforced.
Finish reading in the Miqo app
1 more minute, then a quiz at the end. Find it under “Dark History → Epidemics”
Point your phone camera here to open the App Store or Google Play.
Sources
- Estimates of losses vary: the most common figure is a third to half of the population, and more in some areas. The dates come from 14th-century documents: England's 1351 Statute of Labourers and Ragusa's 1377 decree