EN
Get the appGet the app
Miqo editors · 1 source

What it looked like

Notice the second case: the verdict was based not on the burn itself, but on what it looked like several days later. The priest examining the wound made the decision, and this was where the system gained some flexibility.

Why it might have worked

There is an explanation that sounds unexpected but fits the sources well. If someone sincerely believes that a higher power will identify the guilty person, the guilty person expects to be exposed, while the innocent person expects to be cleared. Both behave differently even before the ordeal.

The guilty person was more likely to make a deal, confess, or avoid the trial. Those who reached the trial were mostly people confident in their own innocence, and the records really do contain many acquittals, far more than you would expect from red-hot iron.

The ordeal filtered people out not through the burn, but earlier: mostly those who believed they had nothing to fear reached it.

Add to this the freedom given to the person evaluating the result. The priest knew the community, knew the rumors, and could interpret the wound as they saw fit. Formally, the higher power made the decision; in practice, it was a person with both information and a reason to get it right.

How it ended

At the beginning of the 13th century, the church banned clergy from taking part in such ordeals, and without that blessing, they lost their meaning. Witness testimony, investigation, and jury trials gradually took their place: human verification instead of divine judgment.

Finish reading in the Miqo app

1 more minute, then a quiz at the end. Find it under “Dark History → Executions and Trials”

QR code to download the Miqo app

Point your phone camera here to open the App Store or Google Play.

Sources

  1. Ordeals were used in medieval Europe until the clergy were banned from taking part in them by a decision of the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. The explanation based on self-selection among believing participants has been proposed in works on the economics of law