What it looked like
In the first days of September 1939, Britain evacuated about 1.5 million people from its cities over just a few days. Children walked in columns from schools to railway stations, with a cardboard tag on their coats and one suitcase each. Teachers accompanied them, not mothers: mothers with children under 5 could go too, while the others stayed behind.
There was also the separate story of the trains that carried Jewish children out of Nazi Germany and neighboring countries. There, separation was not a calculation but a condition: visas were issued to children, but not to adults. Parents put their children on the train knowing they might never see them again.
Why parents were left behind
The logic was sound, but the price turned out to be higher than expected. The first winter passed without bombing, and more than half of the children were taken home by their parents - just before the attacks began in earnest. In the autumn of 1940, the evacuation had to be repeated, and the second time was harder than the first.
What it led to
The separation cost more than the organizers had expected. Doctors working with evacuated children saw that many of them struggled with losing their homes more than with the bombings themselves. These observations became the foundation for postwar work on attachment and on the fact that a child needs more than shelter and food.
The lesson was learned. Evacuation plans in the second half of the century tried to keep families together, or at least leave one adult with each child. That is the main lesson of a story that was designed as a purely logistical problem.
Finish reading in the Miqo app
1 more minute, then a quiz at the end. Find it under “Dark History → Children at War”
Point your phone camera here to open the App Store or Google Play.
Sources
- The 1939 British evacuation and the evacuation of children from Europe are documented in wartime records. Observations of separated children became the foundation for the work of John Bowlby and Anna Freud in the late 1940s