What empathy is made of
One word covers 3 different things. The first is response: you feel uneasy when someone near you is suffering. The second is accuracy: you correctly guess what's happening to them right now. The third is a willingness to do something about it. They're only loosely connected. You can keenly feel someone else's pain yet repeatedly get its cause wrong - and offer the wrong kind of comfort.
The innate part is debated, but the rough scale is consistent. Twin studies put it at about a third of the differences, while analyses of shared genetic variants put it at around a tenth. Even using the higher estimate, 2 thirds of the variation comes down to experience, environment, and habits.
upper estimate of heredity's contribution to differences in empathy
Why "put yourself in their shoes" barely helps
It's the most common advice - and it performs worst in testing. In a series of 25 experiments, people were asked to guess their partner's feelings, opinions, and sometimes whether they were lying. One group was first asked to put themselves in the other person's shoes, while the other wasn't. The first group's accuracy didn't improve, and was sometimes worse: imagination substituted not a real person, but your model of that person.
Something else helped - not taking someone else's perspective, but getting it. Accuracy improved in one case: when people had a chance to ask and hear the answer. It sounds almost insultingly simple, but that's where the trainable skill lies.
- Notice
- Guess
- Ask
- Clarify
What you train isn't sensitivity, but the habit of treating a guess as a guess. You'll still fill in someone else's state in a fraction of a second - your brain doesn't know another way. The difference is what happens next: do you treat that version as fact, or ask a short question and revise it?
Empathy drops when you're rushed
There's an uncomfortable part of the answer, too. In a well-known experiment, students were sent from one building to another to give a sermon - some of them on the Good Samaritan. Along the way, a person was lying in the passageway and groaning. The sermon topic had almost no effect. Something else did: whether students were told they were running late. The sample was small, about 40 people, but the share who stopped changed sharply.
The takeaway is simple: your ability to respond isn't spread evenly inside you. It dips when you're rushed or have 10 things on your mind. Building empathy means not only practicing the question, but also choosing a moment when you have enough attention for the answer.
What best helps you understand someone else's state more accurately?
Why is it better not to start an important conversation on the run?
Sources
- Based on: Warrier et al., Translational Psychiatry, 2018 - genetics of empathy
- Eyal, Steffel, Epley, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2018 - series of experiments on perspective-taking
- Darley, Batson, 1973 - experiment on rushing
Next in the “Empathy” series
2 articles in full on the site, 3 more in the app
